L
Listicler
Backend as a Service

7 Databases With Generous Free Tiers for Side Projects (2026)

7 tools compared
Top Picks

Your side project needs a database, and you need it to cost zero dollars — ideally forever, or at least until the project either dies quietly or starts making money. This sounds simple, but the landscape of free database tiers in 2026 is a minefield of asterisks. "Free" might mean your database pauses after a week of inactivity. "Generous" might mean 512 MB that fills up the moment you store anything with images or logs. "Forever" might mean "until we remove the free tier" — ask PlanetScale users who woke up to a $39/month minimum in April 2024, or ElephantSQL users whose service shut down entirely in January 2025.

The free tier rug-pull has become a real pattern, and it's changed how developers should evaluate database options. The question isn't just "how much storage do I get for free?" — it's how sustainable is this free tier as a business model? Databases funded by venture capital growth metrics have different incentives than databases with profitable paid tiers or open-source self-hosting options. When choosing a database for a side project, you're making a bet on the provider's long-term economics, not just their current pricing page.

The criteria that actually matter for side project databases, in order: storage limits (can you store real data, not just a demo?), pause/sleep policies (will your app go cold when nobody visits for a week?), connection model (will serverless functions exhaust your connection pool?), read/write throughput (will one good day on Hacker News break your free tier?), and vendor lock-in (how painful is migration if the free tier disappears?). We ignored trial-only tiers, credit-based tiers that expire, and services requiring a credit card to start.

This guide covers seven databases across three paradigms — managed Postgres, SQLite/libSQL at the edge, and specialized backends — each evaluated for how well their free tier actually supports a real side project that might go months between updates or might suddenly get 10,000 visitors in a day. Browse all backend-as-a-service tools for the full landscape.

Full Comparison

Distributed SQLite at the edge — databases everywhere with sub-millisecond reads

💰 Free Starter tier with 5 GB storage & 500M rows read/mo, Scaler at $29/mo, Pro at $49/mo

Turso offers the most generous free tier of any managed database in 2026: 5 GB of storage, 500 million rows read per month, 10 million rows written per month, and up to 100 databases — all without a credit card. For context, Supabase gives you 500 MB and Neon gives you 0.5 GB per project. Turso gives you ten times that.

The technology underneath is libSQL, an open-source fork of SQLite maintained by Turso's team. This matters for side projects because SQLite's operational simplicity (no connection pooling, no vacuum maintenance, no pg_dump rituals) means less DevOps overhead when you just want to ship and forget. Turso adds what SQLite lacks: managed hosting, edge replication, and multi-tenancy. Your database runs at the edge closest to your users, with read replicas automatically distributed across Turso's global network. For a side project deployed on Vercel, Cloudflare Workers, or Fly.io, this translates to sub-10ms database reads without any configuration.

The 100-database limit on the free tier enables a database-per-user or database-per-tenant architecture that would be absurdly expensive with Postgres-based providers. Building a SaaS side project? Give each customer their own database for free. The embedded replicas feature lets you bundle a local SQLite replica inside your app for zero-latency reads — the database syncs asynchronously with the cloud. For side projects that sit idle for weeks, there's no inactivity pausing or cold start penalty.

Edge ReplicationEmbedded ReplicaslibSQL (Open-Source SQLite Fork)Database-Per-Tenant ArchitectureMulti-DB SchemasPoint-in-Time RecoveryPlatform APIS3-Based Diskless Architecture

Pros

  • 5 GB free storage — 10x more than Supabase or Neon's free tiers
  • 100 databases included free, enabling database-per-tenant architectures at zero cost
  • No inactivity pausing — your side project stays responsive even after weeks of no traffic
  • Edge replication delivers sub-10ms reads globally without configuration
  • Embedded replicas allow zero-latency local reads with async cloud sync

Cons

  • SQLite/libSQL, not Postgres — different SQL dialect and no stored procedures or advanced Postgres extensions
  • Smaller ecosystem and community compared to Postgres or MongoDB — fewer tutorials, ORMs, and tools
  • Write throughput is limited by SQLite's single-writer model — not ideal for write-heavy workloads

Our Verdict: Most generous free tier overall — 5 GB storage and 100 databases make it the best choice for side projects that need room to grow without paying

Open-source Firebase alternative built on PostgreSQL

💰 Free tier with 500MB DB and 50K MAU; Pro from \u002425/mo per project with usage-based scaling

Supabase isn't just a database — it's the entire backend your side project needs, packaged behind a single free tier. You get a managed Postgres database (500 MB), authentication with 50K monthly active users, 1 GB file storage, real-time subscriptions, and edge functions — all the infrastructure that would otherwise require stitching together five separate services. For side projects where you want to go from idea to deployed app in a weekend, Supabase's "one platform" approach eliminates the integration tax.

The Postgres foundation means you're not learning a proprietary query language or locked into a vendor-specific data model. Use any Postgres client, any ORM (Prisma, Drizzle, Knex), and any migration tool. Supabase auto-generates REST and GraphQL APIs from your schema via PostgREST, so you can start querying data immediately without writing a single API route. The row-level security system lets you define access policies directly in SQL — no middleware layer needed.

The honest caveat: Supabase pauses free-tier projects after 7 days of inactivity. This is the biggest gotcha for side projects that sit dormant between bursts of development or usage. When paused, your app returns connection errors until you manually unpause in the dashboard. It's not data loss — your data is preserved — but it means your side project isn't truly "always on" unless you set up a cron ping to keep it awake. The jump to the Pro plan ($25/month) removes pausing but is steep for a project that generates zero revenue.

PostgreSQL DatabaseAuto-Generated REST & GraphQL APIsAuthentication & AuthorizationRealtime SubscriptionsEdge FunctionsFile StorageVector Embeddings (pgvector)Database Studio

Pros

  • Complete backend stack — Postgres + auth + file storage + real-time + edge functions in one free tier
  • Standard Postgres underneath — no vendor lock-in, use any ORM or migration tool
  • Auto-generated REST and GraphQL APIs eliminate boilerplate backend code
  • 50K monthly active users on free tier is more than most side projects will ever need
  • Open-source and self-hostable if you outgrow the free tier or want full control

Cons

  • Projects pause after 7 days of inactivity — your app goes offline until manually unpaused
  • 500 MB database storage fills quickly if you store anything beyond basic relational data
  • Only 2 free projects — if you have multiple side projects, you'll hit this limit fast

Our Verdict: Best complete backend for side projects — one free tier replaces five services, though the 7-day pause policy means your app isn't truly always-on

Serverless Postgres with branching, scale-to-zero, and instant provisioning

💰 Free tier with 0.5 GB storage & 100 CU-hours/month; Launch from $19/mo, Scale from $69/mo, Business from $700/mo

Neon is the best option for developers who want real Postgres — not a Postgres-compatible alternative, not a platform that happens to use Postgres underneath, but a managed Postgres service with modern developer experience features built on top. The free tier gives you 0.5 GB per project across up to 100 projects, 100 compute-hours per month, and 10 database branches — enough to run a meaningful side project and use branching for development workflows.

The killer feature for side projects is database branching. Create a branch of your production database to test schema migrations, experiment with data transformations, or give each pull request its own database copy — then merge or discard. This is the workflow that PlanetScale pioneered and developers loved, now available on free-tier Postgres. For side projects where you're iterating rapidly and don't want to trash your production data during experiments, branching eliminates the "I'll just test in prod" temptation.

Neon's serverless architecture scales compute to zero after 5 minutes of inactivity, which means you're not wasting compute-hours when nobody's using your app. The tradeoff is a cold start of 500ms-2s on the first query after the database wakes up. For side projects serving real users, this means the first page load after a quiet period feels sluggish. For APIs and background jobs, it's rarely noticeable. The Neon serverless driver works with edge runtimes (Vercel, Cloudflare Workers) via HTTP, so you don't need a persistent connection pool.

Scale-to-ZeroDatabase BranchingAutoscalingServerless DriverPoint-in-Time RecoveryLogical ReplicationRead ReplicasFull Postgres Compatibility

Pros

  • True managed Postgres — full extension support including pgvector, PostGIS, and pg_trgm
  • Database branching on free tier for safe schema migrations and PR-based dev workflows
  • 100 projects on free tier — generous for developers with multiple side projects
  • Serverless driver works with edge runtimes via HTTP — no connection pool needed
  • Scale-to-zero means you only consume compute when your app is actually serving traffic

Cons

  • 500ms-2s cold start after 5 minutes of inactivity — first query is slow for dormant projects
  • 0.5 GB per project is tight — less than Supabase and far less than Turso's 5 GB
  • No built-in auth, storage, or API generation — it's a database only, not a backend platform

Our Verdict: Best serverless Postgres for developers who want standard tooling with modern DevEx — branching and 100 free projects make it ideal for prolific side project builders

Open-source backend in a single file — embedded database, auth, file storage, and admin dashboard

💰 Free and open-source (MIT License)

PocketBase takes a fundamentally different approach: there is no free tier because there is no vendor. It's a single Go binary that you download and run. Embedded SQLite database, authentication (email + OAuth2), file storage, real-time subscriptions, REST API, and a polished admin dashboard — all in one 15MB executable. No external services, no API keys, no monthly invoices, no free tier to lose.

For side projects, PocketBase's economics are unbeatable. Deploy it on a $5/month VPS (Hetzner, DigitalOcean, Fly.io) and you get more resources than any managed free tier — typically 20-50 GB of disk, 1-2 GB of RAM, and no artificial limits on connections, reads, or writes. The total cost of running PocketBase for a year ($60) is less than one month of most databases' entry-level paid plans. And because it's MIT-licensed open source with 40,000+ GitHub stars, the project's survival doesn't depend on a company's funding runway.

The tradeoff is operational responsibility. You handle backups (use Litestream for continuous SQLite replication to S3), updates (download the new binary and restart), and uptime (your server goes down, your app goes down). There's no auto-scaling, no edge replication, and no managed monitoring. For developers comfortable with basic server administration, this is trivial. For those who want zero ops, the managed databases above are better fits. PocketBase is best for the developer who thinks "I'd rather own my infrastructure than rent someone's free tier."

Single-Binary DeploymentEmbedded SQLite DatabaseReal-Time SubscriptionsAuthentication SystemFile StorageAdmin DashboardREST APIExtensible with Hooks

Pros

  • Zero recurring cost for the software — MIT license, no subscriptions, no usage limits whatsoever
  • Complete backend in one binary: database, auth, file storage, real-time, admin UI, REST API
  • No vendor dependency — your data lives on your server, no free tier can be revoked
  • Setup takes seconds — download, run, done. No Docker, no dependencies, no configuration
  • 40K+ GitHub stars with active development and a passionate community

Cons

  • Self-hosted means you handle backups, updates, and uptime — no managed convenience
  • Single-server architecture with no built-in horizontal scaling or replication
  • SQLite's single-writer model limits write concurrency for high-traffic applications

Our Verdict: Best zero-cost option for developers comfortable with self-hosting — own your entire backend with no vendor dependency and no artificial limits

Google's mobile and web app development platform

💰 Free Spark plan, pay-as-you-go Blaze plan with $300 free credits

Firebase earns its spot for one specific use case: mobile and offline-first applications. Firestore's client SDKs handle offline data caching, conflict resolution, and background sync automatically — features that would take weeks to build on top of a raw Postgres database. If your side project is a mobile app or a PWA that needs to work without internet, Firebase remains the most practical choice.

The free Spark plan includes 1 GB of Firestore storage, 50K reads/day, 20K writes/day, 20K deletes/day, plus Firebase Authentication for 50K monthly active users, 5 GB of Cloud Storage, and Firebase Hosting. The daily operation limits reset at midnight Pacific time. For a side project with modest daily usage, these limits are comfortable. The risk is a usage spike — one viral day that exceeds 50K reads will stop your app until midnight resets the counter.

The honest concern with Firebase is lock-in. Firestore's document model, query language, and security rules are proprietary. Migrating from Firestore to Postgres or MongoDB requires rewriting your data access layer, not just changing a connection string. For side projects that might evolve into real products, this lock-in cost should factor into the decision. Google has never removed Firebase's free tier (it's been free since 2014), so the free tier sustainability concern is lower than newer providers — but the migration cost if you choose to leave is higher.

Cloud FirestoreFirebase AuthenticationCloud FunctionsFirebase HostingCloud StorageRealtime DatabaseCrashlyticsCloud Messaging (FCM)Remote Config

Pros

  • Offline-first architecture with automatic sync — the only free option with production-grade offline support
  • 1 GB Firestore storage plus auth, hosting, and cloud storage on the free tier
  • Mature platform (since 2014) with the most stable free tier track record on this list
  • Client SDKs for iOS, Android, web, Flutter, Unity — broadest mobile platform support
  • Firebase Authentication handles social login, phone auth, and email/password at zero cost

Cons

  • Daily operation limits (50K reads) can be exhausted by a single moderate-traffic day
  • Significant vendor lock-in — Firestore's data model and query language are proprietary to Google
  • NoSQL document model requires denormalized data design that feels unnatural for relational data

Our Verdict: Best for mobile and offline-first side projects — Firestore's automatic sync and broad SDK support are unmatched, despite the vendor lock-in tradeoff

#6
MongoDB Atlas

MongoDB Atlas

Fully managed MongoDB cloud database with a free-forever tier

💰 Free forever M0 cluster (512 MB), Flex from $8/mo, Dedicated from ~$57/mo (M10)

MongoDB Atlas offers something rare in the free database tier market: a cluster that never pauses, never sleeps, and never requires a credit card. The M0 free tier has been available since 2016 and MongoDB has consistently maintained it through multiple pricing changes — making it one of the most stable free tiers in the industry. For side projects that need to stay online even when you forget about them for months, this reliability matters.

The free M0 cluster gives you 512 MB of storage, 100 operations per second, and 500 connections on a shared instance. The storage is tight for anything data-intensive, but for a typical CRUD side project — user accounts, settings, posts, comments — 512 MB holds tens of thousands of documents. The 100 ops/sec limit is the real constraint: moderate traffic or inefficient queries can hit this ceiling and cause timeouts. Connection pooling is essential if you're using serverless functions.

MongoDB's document model is genuinely useful for side projects with flexible or evolving schemas. No migrations to run when you add a field, no ALTER TABLE statements, no Prisma schema to regenerate. Just start storing data in whatever shape you need. Atlas Search (full-text search built on Lucene) and Atlas Vector Search are included on free-tier clusters, which is unusual — most providers gate search capabilities behind paid plans. For a side project experimenting with AI features or search functionality, you get those capabilities without upgrading.

Managed MongoDB ClustersAtlas SearchAtlas Vector SearchAtlas ChartsAuto-Scaling & ShardingGlobal Multi-Region ClustersAtlas Triggers & Stream ProcessingEnterprise Security

Pros

  • Never pauses or sleeps — M0 cluster stays online 24/7 with no inactivity timeout
  • No credit card required and available since 2016 — most stable free tier track record alongside Firebase
  • Atlas Search and Vector Search included free — experiment with full-text search and AI features at zero cost
  • Flexible document model requires no schema migrations — add fields anytime without ALTER TABLE
  • 500 connection limit is generous compared to most free-tier connection caps

Cons

  • 512 MB storage is among the tightest limits on this list — fills fast with embedded documents or media references
  • 100 ops/sec hard cap causes timeouts under moderate load — requires efficient query design
  • Proprietary query language and document model create meaningful lock-in compared to SQL databases

Our Verdict: Best always-on free database — the M0 cluster that never pauses or expires, ideal for side projects that need reliable uptime without active monitoring

Serverless data platform for Redis, Kafka, and message queues

💰 Free tier with 10K commands/day, pay-as-you-go at $0.20 per 100K commands after free tier

Upstash fills a different role than the other databases on this list — it's the free Redis that pairs with your primary database for caching, rate limiting, session storage, and message queuing. The free tier gives you 256 MB of data, 500K commands per month, and 10 GB bandwidth — more than enough to cache your most-accessed queries, implement API rate limiting, and store user sessions for a side project.

The serverless model with REST API access is what makes Upstash particularly suitable for side projects deployed on edge platforms. Traditional Redis requires a persistent TCP connection, which doesn't work with serverless functions that spin up and down. Upstash's HTTP-based Redis client works natively with Vercel Edge Functions, Cloudflare Workers, Deno Deploy, and any serverless runtime. You get Redis semantics without the connection management headache that makes self-hosted Redis painful in serverless architectures.

Beyond Redis, the free tier includes QStash (serverless message queue with 500 messages/day) and Upstash Workflow (durable serverless workflow execution). For side projects that need background job processing — sending emails, processing webhooks, running periodic tasks — QStash replaces the need for a separate job queue service. The pay-as-you-go model after the free tier ($0.20 per 100K commands) means you scale smoothly without a pricing cliff — your side project doesn't jump from $0 to $25/month overnight.

Serverless Redis with REST APIQStash Message QueueUpstash KafkaUpstash VectorUpstash WorkflowGlobal ReplicationEdge-Compatible SDKsCost Ceiling Protection

Pros

  • REST API works natively with serverless and edge runtimes — no persistent connection needed
  • Free QStash (500 messages/day) and Workflow execution included — background jobs at zero cost
  • Pay-as-you-go scaling ($0.20/100K commands) avoids the $0-to-$25 pricing cliff of other providers
  • Pairs perfectly with any primary database on this list as a caching and rate-limiting layer
  • 256 MB Redis with 500K commands handles caching, sessions, and rate limiting for most side projects

Cons

  • Not a primary database — Redis is for caching and ephemeral data, not your main data store
  • 500K commands/month can be tight if you use Redis heavily for real-time features or pub/sub
  • Single database on the free tier — multiple projects need to share one Redis instance or use key prefixes

Our Verdict: Best free Redis for serverless side projects — the caching and rate-limiting layer that complements any primary database on this list

Our Conclusion

Quick Decision Guide

Need the most storage for free? Turso — 5 GB across 100 databases. Nothing else comes close on raw free capacity.

Want a complete backend, not just a database? Supabase — Postgres + auth + storage + edge functions + real-time. One platform replaces five services.

Need standard Postgres with modern DevEx? Neon — Serverless Postgres with database branching, 100 projects on free tier, and the Postgres ecosystem you already know.

Want zero recurring cost with no limits? PocketBase — Self-host on a $5/month VPS and you own everything. No free tier to lose because there's no vendor.

Building a mobile app with offline sync? Firebase — Firestore's offline-first architecture and client SDKs are unmatched for mobile.

Need a document database that never sleeps? MongoDB Atlas — M0 cluster stays on 24/7 with no inactivity pausing. The free tier that doesn't punish you for shipping and forgetting.

Need caching or rate limiting alongside your primary DB? Upstash — Free Redis via REST API. Pairs with any primary database on this list.

The Practical Stacks

  • "Ship this weekend" stack: Supabase free (Postgres + auth + storage) = complete backend in 30 minutes
  • "Maximum free resources" stack: Turso (5 GB primary) + Upstash (free Redis cache) = 5.25 GB free storage
  • "I own everything" stack: PocketBase on a VPS + Litestream backups = no vendor dependency at all
  • "Postgres purist" stack: Neon (serverless Postgres) + Upstash (Redis) = standard tools, serverless pricing

The database-as-a-service market is consolidating around Postgres compatibility and scale-to-zero pricing. The W3C-style "Postgres wire protocol" is becoming the standard interface — Neon, Supabase, and CockroachDB all speak it. If vendor lock-in concerns you, choosing a Postgres-compatible database gives you the most migration options when things change. And in this market, things always change.

For related tools, see our backend-as-a-service tools for full platform comparisons.

Frequently Asked Questions

Will my database get deleted if I don't use it for a while?

It depends on the provider. Supabase pauses projects after 7 days of inactivity (data preserved, but your app returns errors until you manually unpause). Neon scales compute to zero after 5 minutes but keeps data intact. MongoDB Atlas M0 clusters never pause or delete. PocketBase is self-hosted so it depends on your server. Always check the specific pause and data retention policies — 'free forever' doesn't always mean 'always running.'

What happens if my side project suddenly gets traffic?

Most free tiers have hard limits that return errors when exceeded — Cloudflare D1 stops processing after 5M daily reads, Firestore stops after 50K daily reads. Turso and MongoDB Atlas throttle performance rather than cutting off access. Supabase and Neon have soft limits that show warnings. For sudden traffic spikes, Turso (500M monthly reads) and Supabase (generous bandwidth) handle the best before hitting walls. Plan your upgrade path before you need it.

Should I use SQL or NoSQL for a side project?

SQL (Postgres via Supabase/Neon, or SQLite via Turso/PocketBase). Relational databases handle almost every side project pattern well, the tooling is mature, and you can always add a document store later if needed. NoSQL (MongoDB, Firebase) makes sense for specific use cases: document-heavy apps with flexible schemas, mobile apps needing offline sync (Firebase), or when you're already deeply familiar with the MongoDB ecosystem. For most side projects, start with Postgres.

Is self-hosting with PocketBase really free?

The software is free (MIT license), but you need a server. A $5/month VPS from Hetzner, DigitalOcean, or Railway gives you more resources than most free database tiers — and you own the data completely. The tradeoff is maintenance: you handle backups, updates, and uptime yourself. For developers comfortable with basic server management, it's the most cost-effective option. For everyone else, managed free tiers are worth the convenience.